The Temple of the Living God
☆ We then, as workers together with him, beseech you also that ye receive not the graceGrace: χάρις (Charis ). The Greek charis (χάρις) denotes unmerited divine favor—God's kindness toward the undeserving. Salvation is 'by grace through faith' (Ephesians 2:8 ), not human merit. Grace: Acts 14:3 , Galatians 2:21 , Titus 2:11 , Hebrews 12:15 , 1 Peter 4:10 +5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:1
Analysis
We then, as workers together with him (συνεργοῦντες, synergountes , 'working together')—Paul identifies himself and his fellow apostles as synergoi , co-laborers with God in the gospel mission. This participial phrase emphasizes divine-human cooperation in ministry, where God's sovereign action does not eliminate human agency but enlists it.
Receive not the grace of God in vain (εἰς κενὸν, eis kenon , 'into emptiness')—The verb dechomai ('receive') in the aorist infinitive suggests a definitive reception that produces no fruit. Paul warns against treating grace as a dead orthodoxy rather than a transformative power. To receive grace 'in vain' is to hear the gospel without genuine repentance, to claim justification without sanctification, to profess faith without obedience.
This verse connects directly to 5:20's appeal to 'be reconciled to God,' serving as both transition and application. Paul's apostolic ministry is not merely proclamation but urgent entreaty (parakaleo , 'beseech') that the Corinthians' initial response to the gospel would bear lasting fruit in holiness.
Historical Context
Paul wrote 2 Corinthians around AD 55-56 from Macedonia, addressing ongoing tensions with the Corinthian church. The church had received Paul's gospel but struggled with false apostles and worldly living. Chapter 6 continues Paul's defense of his apostolic ministry (chapters 1-7) and his appeal for the Corinthians to live consistently with their profession of faith.
Questions for Reflection
In what ways might you be receiving God's grace 'in vain'—professing faith without corresponding transformation?
How does viewing yourself as God's 'co-worker' change your understanding of your role in ministry and witness?
What evidence in your life demonstrates that you have received God's grace with fruitfulness rather than emptiness?
Open full verse page →
☆ (For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvationSalvation: σωτηρία (Soteria ). The Greek soteria (σωτηρία) denotes salvation, deliverance, or preservation—rescue from sin's penalty and power. It encompasses justification, sanctification, and glorification. Salvation: Isaiah 49:8 . Parallel theme: Isaiah 61:2 , Ezekiel 16:8 , Luke 4:19 , Hebrews 3:7 +2
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:2
Analysis
I have heard thee in a time accepted (καιρῷ δεκτῷ, kairo dekto , 'acceptable time')—Paul quotes Isaiah 49:8 (LXX), applying the Servant's restoration promise to the present gospel age. The perfect tense epēkousa ('I have heard') indicates completed divine action with ongoing results. God's hearing implies answered prayer and covenant faithfulness.
Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation —The doubled idou ('behold') creates emphatic urgency. Paul shifts from Isaiah's prophetic future to realized eschatology: the 'favorable time' prophesied has arrived in Christ. Kairos (opportune moment) differs from chronos (chronological time)—this is the decisive salvific moment in redemptive history.
The parenthetical nature of verse 2 emphasizes its supporting role: Paul's entreaty (v.1) is grounded in the theological reality that the messianic age has dawned. Delay in responding to the gospel is not merely unwise but tragic, squandering the divinely appointed moment of grace.
Historical Context
Isaiah 49:8 originally addressed Israel's restoration from Babylonian exile, promising God would answer the Servant and restore the nation. Paul applies this typologically to the gospel era, where Christ the Servant brings universal salvation. The 'now' contrasts with the old covenant's shadows and anticipations—the reality has come in Christ's death and resurrection.
Questions for Reflection
How does recognizing that you live in 'the day of salvation' create urgency in your response to God and witness to others?
In what ways might you be presuming on future opportunities for repentance or obedience rather than responding 'now'?
How does Paul's application of Isaiah 49 demonstrate the unity of Scripture and Christ-centered interpretation of the Old Testament?
Open full verse page →
☆ Giving no offence in any thing, that the ministry be not blamed:
Parallel theme: Matthew 17:27 , Romans 14:13 , 1 Corinthians 9:12 , 9:22
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:3
Analysis
Giving no offence in any thing (μηδεμίαν ἐν μηδενὶ διδόντες προσκοπήν, mēdemian en mēdeni didontes proskopēn , 'placing no stumbling block in anything')—The present participle didontes indicates Paul's habitual practice. Proskopē means an obstacle or occasion for stumbling, something that would cause another to trip or fall into sin. The doubled negative (mēdemian en mēdeni ) creates comprehensive scope: 'no offense in nothing.'
That the ministry be not blamed (ἵνα μὴ μωμηθῇ ἡ διακονία, hina mē mōmēthē hē diakonia )—The subjunctive mood with hina expresses purpose: Paul's blameless conduct aims to protect the gospel ministry from reproach. Mōmaomai means to find fault, criticize, or discredit. Paul recognizes that ministerial failure brings public disgrace not merely on the minister but on the gospel itself.
This verse introduces the famous 'hardship catalogue' (vv.4-10) by establishing its purpose: Paul's conduct must adorn the gospel, not discredit it. True apostolic ministry combines doctrinal fidelity with ethical integrity—orthodoxy without orthopraxy breeds hypocrisy and undermines evangelistic credibility.
Historical Context
Paul faced constant criticism from opponents in Corinth who questioned his apostolic credentials and conduct. His opponents likely pointed to his sufferings as evidence of divine disfavor. Paul turns this argument on its head in verses 4-10, showing that apostolic hardships, borne with godly character, actually validate rather than discredit true ministry.
Questions for Reflection
In what areas of your life might your conduct create stumbling blocks that discredit the gospel?
How does Paul's concern that 'the ministry be not blamed' challenge modern individualism that divorces personal conduct from gospel witness?
What practical steps can you take to ensure your Christian witness is reinforced rather than contradicted by your lifestyle?
Open full verse page →
☆ But in all things approving ourselves as the ministers of GodGod: Θεός (Theos ). The Greek Theos (Θεός) refers to deity, used both for the one true God and false gods. Context determines whether it denotes the Father specifically or the Godhead generally. References God: Joel 2:17 . Parallel theme: 2 Corinthians 3:6 , 4:8 , 11:27 , 12:10 +2
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:4
Analysis
But in all things approving ourselves as the ministers of God (ἀλλ' ἐν παντὶ συνιστάνοντες ἑαυτοὺς ὡς θεοῦ διάκονοι, all' en panti synistanontes heautous hōs theou diakonoi )—The verb synistēmi means to commend, demonstrate, or prove genuine. Paul uses this verb repeatedly in 2 Corinthians (3:1; 4:2; 5:12; 6:4; 7:11; 10:12, 18; 12:11) in his self-defense. Unlike false apostles who commend themselves through self-promotion, Paul's commendation comes through suffering endured with godly virtue.
In much patience, in afflictions, in necessities, in distresses (ἐν ὑπομονῇ πολλῇ, ἐν θλίψεσιν, ἐν ἀνάγκαις, ἐν στενοχωρίαις)—This begins the first triad of hardships (vv.4-5 list nine total). Hypomonē ('patience' or 'steadfast endurance') heads the list as the overarching virtue that characterizes Paul's response to all subsequent trials. Thlipsis (afflictions/tribulations) refers to external pressures and persecutions. Anankē (necessities) indicates compelling hardships or constraints. Stenochōria (distresses) literally means 'narrow space,' conveying the feeling of being hemmed in or under crushing pressure.
These opening terms are general categories that the following verses specify. Paul's catalogue functions apologetically (proving his apostolic authenticity) and pastorally (modeling Christian endurance). The Greek preposition en ('in') repeated throughout vv.4-10 indicates the sphere or circumstance in which apostolic ministry operates—not comfort and ease but suffering and paradox.
Historical Context
Greco-Roman culture valued honor, status, and strength. Suffering was viewed as shameful, a sign of divine disfavor or personal weakness. Paul radically inverts these values, showing that apostolic suffering validates rather than invalidates his ministry. The 'hardship catalogue' was a known rhetorical form in Stoic philosophy and Hellenistic Judaism, but Paul fills it with distinctly Christian content.
Questions for Reflection
How does Paul's commendation through suffering challenge contemporary church culture's emphasis on success, comfort, and celebrity pastors?
In what specific trials is God calling you to demonstrate 'much patience' and thereby prove the genuineness of your faith?
How do you respond when God's calling involves distresses and necessities rather than blessing and ease?
Open full verse page →
☆ In stripes, in imprisonments, in tumults, in labours, in watchings, in fastings;
Parallel theme: 2 Corinthians 11:27 , Acts 17:5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:5
Analysis
In stripes, in imprisonments, in tumults (ἐν πληγαῖς, ἐν φυλακαῖς, ἐν ἀκαταστασίαις, en plēgais, en phylakais, en akatastasiais )—This second triad specifies concrete forms of persecution Paul endured. Plēgē means a blow or wound, referring to literal beatings (see 2 Cor 11:23-25: five times 39 lashes from Jews, three times beaten with rods by Romans). Phylakē (imprisonments) Paul experienced multiple times (Philippi, Jerusalem, Caesarea, Rome). Akatastasia (tumults/riots) refers to violent public disturbances, like those at Ephesus (Acts 19:23-41) or Jerusalem (Acts 21:27-36).
In labours, in watchings, in fastings (ἐν κόποις, ἐν ἀγρυπνίαις, ἐν νηστείαις, en kopois, en agrypniais, en nēsteiais )—The third triad emphasizes voluntary hardships Paul embraced for the gospel. Kopos denotes exhausting toil or hard labor—Paul supported himself through tentmaking while planting churches (Acts 18:3; 1 Thess 2:9). Agrypnia literally means 'sleeplessness' or 'watchings'—Paul sacrificed rest for prayer and ministry (cf. 2 Cor 11:27). Nēsteia (fastings) likely refers both to involuntary hunger due to poverty and voluntary fasting for spiritual purposes.
Verses 4-5 complete three triads (nine hardships total), moving from general to specific, from imposed suffering to voluntary sacrifice. Paul doesn't merely endure these trials passively but actively embraces hardship as the arena where apostolic ministry proves genuine. This contradicts both the Corinthians' triumphalism and modern prosperity theology.
Historical Context
Acts records multiple instances of Paul's sufferings: beaten and imprisoned in Philippi (Acts 16:22-24), riot at Ephesus (Acts 19:23-41), multiple assassination plots (Acts 23:12-15). Paul's own summary in 2 Corinthians 11:23-28 provides even more detail: shipwrecks, rivers, robbers, sleepless nights, hunger, thirst, cold. These were not theoretical afflictions but the daily reality of apostolic ministry in the first century.
Questions for Reflection
What voluntary hardships is God calling you to embrace for the sake of the gospel—whether 'labours,' 'watchings,' or 'fastings'?
How does Paul's willingness to suffer for Christ challenge your own comfort-seeking and risk-avoidance?
In what ways might the modern church need to recover Paul's model of ministerial credibility through suffering rather than worldly success?
Open full verse page →
☆ By pureness, by knowledge, by longsuffering, by kindness, by the Holy Ghost, by loveLove: ἀγάπη (Agape ). The Greek agape (ἀγάπη) denotes self-sacrificial, unconditional love—the highest form of love, characterizing God's nature (1 John 4:8 ) and the love Christians are called to demonstrate. Love: 2 Corinthians 2:4 , 11:11 , 12:15 , Ephesians 4:2 . Spirit: 2 Corinthians 11:4 +5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:6
Analysis
By pureness, by knowledge, by longsuffering, by kindness (ἐν ἁγνότητι, ἐν γνώσει, ἐν μακροθυμίᾳ, ἐν χρηστότητι, en hagnotēti, en gnōsei, en makrothymia, en chrēstotēti )—Shifting from external hardships (vv.4-5) to internal virtues, Paul begins a new catalogue of nine positive qualities (vv.6-7) that characterize genuine apostolic ministry. Hagnotēs means moral purity, integrity, sexual chastity—essential given accusations Paul apparently faced. Gnōsis (knowledge) refers to true spiritual understanding of Christ and the gospel, contrasting with false teachers' empty speculation. Makrothymia (longsuffering/patience) means slowness to anger, endurance of wrongs without retaliation—a godly attribute (Ex 34:6) manifested in Christ. Chrēstotēs (kindness/goodness) describes God's benevolent disposition toward sinners (Rom 2:4) now reflected in Paul's ministry.
By the Holy Ghost, by love unfeigned (ἐν πνεύματι ἁγίῳ, ἐν ἀγάπῃ ἀνυποκρίτῳ, en pneumati hagiō, en agapē anypokriō )—Pneuma hagion could mean the Holy Spirit (capital S) or Paul's holy spirit/attitude (lowercase s); context favors the former, as the Spirit is the source of all these virtues. Agapē anypokritos means 'unhypocritical love,' love without pretense or ulterior motive (cf. Rom 12:9; 1 Pet 1:22). This love contrasts with the flattering manipulation of false teachers.
These virtues demonstrate that Paul's ministry flows not from human strength but divine enablement. Character validates calling—doctrinal orthodoxy without ethical integrity is barren. The 'by' (en ) indicates both sphere and means: these virtues are both the environment and instrument of true ministry.
Historical Context
Paul's opponents in Corinth likely accused him of moral compromise, intellectual inferiority, harshness, and insincerity. These six virtues directly counter such charges. The emphasis on the Holy Spirit reflects Paul's consistent teaching that genuine Christian life and ministry are impossible apart from the Spirit's empowering presence (Rom 8:1-17; Gal 5:16-26).
Questions for Reflection
Which of these six virtues—purity, knowledge, longsuffering, kindness, Holy Spirit power, or unhypocritical love—is most lacking in your Christian walk?
How does dependence on the Holy Spirit distinguish genuine Christianity from mere moralism or self-help religion?
In what relationships or situations is God calling you to demonstrate 'love unfeigned'—authentic, costly, non-manipulative love?
Open full verse page →
☆ By the word of truth, by the power of God, by the armour of righteousness on the right hand and on the left,
References God: 2 Corinthians 13:4 . Word: 2 Corinthians 4:2 , Psalms 119:43 , Ephesians 1:13 , 2 Timothy 2:15 +4
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:7
Analysis
By the word of truth, by the power of God (ἐν λόγῳ ἀληθείας, ἐν δυνάμει θεοῦ, en logō alētheias, en dynamei theou )—Logos alētheias refers to the gospel message itself, the true word as opposed to false teaching (cf. Eph 1:13; Col 1:5; 2 Tim 2:15). Paul's ministry rests not on eloquent rhetoric or philosophical speculation but on faithful proclamation of revealed truth. Dynamis theou (God's power) contrasts human weakness; this power manifests in conversion, perseverance, and miracles (Rom 1:16; 1 Cor 1:18; 2:4-5).
By the armour of righteousness on the right hand and on the left (διὰ τῶν ὅπλων τῆς δικαιοσύνης τῶν δεξιῶν καὶ ἀριστερῶν, dia tōn hoplōn tēs dikaiosynēs tōn dexiōn kai aristerōn )—Hopla means weapons or armor (cf. Rom 13:12; Eph 6:11-17). 'Right hand and left' likely refers to offensive weapons (sword in right hand) and defensive armor (shield in left), indicating comprehensive spiritual equipment. Dikaiosynē (righteousness) is both imputed (justification) and imparted (sanctification)—the righteousness of Christ as both legal standing and practical holiness.
Paul militarizes his metaphors: ministry is spiritual warfare requiring divine weaponry. The armor of righteousness protects against accusations (having clean hands) and enables bold offense (wielding truth as a sword). This anticipates the fuller development in Ephesians 6:10-18.
Historical Context
Roman soldiers were visible throughout the empire, providing a familiar metaphor for Paul's audience. The emphasis on God's power rather than human eloquence directly addresses Corinthian fascination with Greek rhetoric and philosophy. Paul's apostolic authority rests not on cultural sophistication but on divine truth and power manifested through weakness.
Questions for Reflection
How are you wielding 'the word of truth' and 'the power of God' rather than relying on human eloquence, manipulation, or worldly strategies?
In what areas of spiritual warfare do you need to better equip yourself with 'the armour of righteousness'—both offensive (proclamation) and defensive (integrity)?
How does Paul's model of ministry challenge pragmatic approaches that prioritize results over faithfulness to God's truth and methods?
Open full verse page →
☆ By honour and dishonour, by evil report and good report: as deceivers, and yet true;
Evil: 1 Peter 4:14 . Parallel theme: Matthew 27:63 , Acts 28:22 , 1 Timothy 4:10 , Revelation 3:9
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:8
Analysis
By honour and dishonour, by evil report and good report (διὰ δόξης καὶ ἀτιμίας, διὰ δυσφημίας καὶ εὐφημίας, dia doxēs kai atimias, dia dysphēmias kai euphēmias )—Paul shifts to a series of antithetical pairs (vv.8-10) that express the paradoxes of apostolic ministry. Doxa (honor/glory) and atimia (dishonor/disgrace) represent opposite social assessments. Dysphēmia (evil report/slander) and euphēmia (good report/praise) refer to reputation—some speak well of Paul, others slander him. The preposition dia ('through' or 'by') indicates these opposites are the path through which Paul ministers.
As deceivers, and yet true (ὡς πλάνοι καὶ ἀληθεῖς, hōs planoi kai alētheis )—Planos means deceiver, imposter, or false teacher—the very accusation Paul's opponents leveled against him. Alēthēs (true, genuine, truthful) expresses Paul's actual character. The construction hōs...kai ('as...and yet') creates dramatic tension: Paul is perceived as a deceiver but actually is truthful.
These paradoxes reflect Christian existence in a fallen world that calls good evil and evil good (Isa 5:20). Paul's reputation fluctuates wildly depending on his audience, but he remains faithful regardless of human opinion. This previews the fuller paradox list in verses 9-10.
Historical Context
Paul faced contradictory assessments: Jewish opponents viewed him as an apostate traitor; Gentile critics saw him as a troublemaker or charlatan; false teachers in Corinth portrayed him as weak, unimpressive, and lacking credentials; while true converts recognized him as a genuine apostle of Christ. Paul learned to minister faithfully through both praise and blame.
Questions for Reflection
How do you respond when you're misunderstood, slandered, or falsely accused—with defensiveness, bitterness, or Christ-like grace?
In what ways might God be using both 'honour and dishonour,' 'evil report and good report' to test and refine your character?
How does Paul's steadfastness amid contradictory opinions challenge modern Christians' addiction to approval and fear of criticism?
Open full verse page →
☆ As unknown, and yet well known; as dying, and, behold, we live; as chastened, and not killed;
Parallel theme: 2 Corinthians 11:6 , Romans 8:36 , 1 Corinthians 4:9
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:9
Analysis
As unknown, and yet well known (ὡς ἀγνοούμενοι καὶ ἐπιγινωσκόμενοι, hōs agnooumenoi kai epiginoskomenoi )—Agnoeō means to be ignored, unrecognized, or regarded as insignificant. Epiginōskō (well known, fully known) indicates thorough recognition. Paul lacked celebrity status in the world's eyes but was fully known by God and true believers. True significance comes from divine rather than human recognition (1 Cor 8:3; Gal 4:9).
As dying, and, behold, we live (ὡς ἀποθνῄσκοντες καὶ ἰδοὺ ζῶμεν, hōs apothnēskontes kai idou zōmen )—The present participle apothnēskontes ('dying') describes Paul's constant brush with death (2 Cor 4:10-11; 11:23; 1 Cor 15:31: 'I die daily'). The interjection idou ('behold!') creates dramatic surprise—yet we live! This paradox reflects both physical preservation despite mortal danger and deeper spiritual truth: Christians die with Christ yet live in resurrection power (Rom 6:8; Gal 2:20; Col 3:3).
As chastened, and not killed (ὡς παιδευόμενοι καὶ μὴ θανατούμενοι, hōs paideuomenoi kai mē thanatoumenoi )—Paideuō means to discipline, correct, or train (see Heb 12:5-11 on God's discipline). Paul interprets his sufferings not as random misfortune or divine abandonment but as fatherly discipline. Yet this discipline doesn't destroy (thanatoō , 'put to death')—God's chastening preserves rather than kills (Ps 118:18).
This triad (unknown/known, dying/living, chastened/not killed) expresses the hiddenness, fragility, and suffering of apostolic ministry, which paradoxically validates rather than invalidates Paul's calling. The world sees only the outward weakness; faith perceives the inward resurrection power.
Historical Context
Paul's sufferings catalog in 2 Corinthians 11:23-28 demonstrates how frequently he faced mortal danger: shipwrecks, robbers, assassination plots, beatings, imprisonment. Yet God repeatedly preserved him (Acts 14:19-20; 16:25-26; 27:43-44). Paul interprets this pattern through the lens of divine discipline and sovereign purpose rather than randomness or luck.
Questions for Reflection
How does knowing you are 'well known' by God, even if 'unknown' by the world, sustain you in obscure or unappreciated service?
In what ways are you experiencing the 'dying' of Christ in your daily life, and what 'life' is being manifested through that dying?
How can you learn to interpret hardships as God's loving discipline rather than evidence of His absence or displeasure?
Open full verse page →
☆ As sorrowful, yet alway rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing all things.
Kingdom: James 2:5 . Sin: Colossians 3:16 . Parallel theme: 2 Corinthians 8:9 , Proverbs 16:16 , John 16:22 +5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:10
Analysis
As sorrowful, yet alway rejoicing (ὡς λυπούμενοι ἀεὶ δὲ χαίροντες, hōs lypoumenoi aei de chairontes )—Lypeō (sorrow/grief) acknowledges real pain—Paul wasn't Stoically indifferent to suffering. Yet chairō (rejoice) modified by aei ('always,' 'continually') indicates simultaneous, constant joy. This isn't emotional denial but spiritual depth: joy rooted in God's presence and promises coexists with sorrow over sin, suffering, and unbelief (cf. Phil 4:4; 1 Thess 5:16).
As poor, yet making many rich (ὡς πτωχοὶ πολλοὺς δὲ πλουτίζοντες, hōs ptōchoi pollous de ploutizontes )—Ptōchos denotes abject poverty, beggarly destitution (not mere lack of luxury). Paul possessed little materially (Phil 4:11-12; 1 Cor 4:11) yet enriched countless souls with gospel wealth. Ploutizō (to make rich) refers primarily to spiritual enrichment (1 Cor 1:5; Eph 3:8; Col 1:27), though it may also include the practical generosity Paul taught (2 Cor 8-9). This inverts worldly values: spiritual wealth infinitely surpasses material prosperity.
As having nothing, and yet possessing all things (ὡς μηδὲν ἔχοντες καὶ πάντα κατέχοντες, hōs mēden echontes kai panta katechontes )—Mēden ('nothing,' emphatic form) expresses absolute material poverty. Yet panta ('all things') modified by katechō (possess, hold fast) indicates comprehensive spiritual wealth. Believers own nothing yet inherit everything in Christ (1 Cor 3:21-23; Rom 8:32)—the entire created order becomes their possession through union with the heir of all things.
This final triad climaxes the paradox series with three contrasts that define Christian existence: simultaneous sorrow and joy, poverty and enrichment, nothingness and all-ness. Paul's catalogue (vv.4-10) demolishes worldly metrics of success, replacing them with cruciform values where weakness becomes strength, death becomes life, and loss becomes gain.
Historical Context
The Corinthians prized wealth, status, wisdom, and power—typical Greco-Roman values. Paul's poverty and sufferings appeared to discredit him in their eyes. His opponents likely boasted of their social standing and material success. Paul radically subverts these values, showing that apostolic credibility lies precisely in suffering that produces spiritual fruitfulness, not in worldly impressiveness that produces empty pride.
Questions for Reflection
How can you cultivate the spiritual maturity to experience 'sorrow yet always rejoicing'—genuine lament coexisting with deep-rooted joy?
In what ways are you 'poor yet making many rich' through spiritual rather than material investment in others?
How does Paul's claim to possess 'all things' in Christ challenge materialistic definitions of security, success, and satisfaction?
Open full verse page →
☆ O ye Corinthians, our mouth is open unto you, our heart is enlarged.
Parallel theme: 2 Corinthians 2:4 , 12:15 , Job 32:20 , Psalms 51:15 , 119:32 +5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:11
Analysis
O ye Corinthians, our mouth is open unto you (Τὸ στόμα ἡμῶν ἀνέῳγεν πρὸς ὑμᾶς, Κορίνθιοι, To stoma hēmōn aneōgen pros hymas, Korinthioi )—The perfect tense aneōgen ('has been opened, stands open') indicates an established state of frankness. Direct address by name ('O Corinthians') creates emotional intimacy and urgency. Paul's open mouth signifies transparent, unguarded communication—he has spoken freely, holding nothing back. This contrasts with manipulation or hidden agendas that characterized false teachers.
Our heart is enlarged (ἡ καρδία ἡμῶν πεπλάτυνται, hē kardia hēmōn peplatyntai )—The perfect tense peplatyntai ('has been enlarged, stands enlarged') describes Paul's expansive affection. Platynō means to widen, broaden, or make spacious. Paul's heart has room for the Corinthians despite their criticism and coolness toward him. This recalls God's promise: 'I will enlarge your heart' (Ps 119:32). Spiritual maturity produces emotional capacity for difficult relationships.
After the hardship catalogue (vv.3-10), Paul shifts to direct pastoral appeal (vv.11-13). His sufferings haven't hardened him or made him bitter—instead, his heart remains open and enlarged toward those who have wounded him. This models Christ-like love that suffers long and is kind (1 Cor 13:4-7).
Historical Context
The Corinthians had received Paul coolly, influenced by critics who questioned his authority and sincerity. Despite this painful rejection, Paul refuses to close his heart or withdraw his affection. His open-hearted appeal demonstrates the genuineness of his apostolic love, contrasting with opponents who flattered the Corinthians while exploiting them (2 Cor 11:20).
Questions for Reflection
Toward whom has your heart become constricted or closed due to conflict, criticism, or disappointment?
How does Paul model 'enlarged heart' ministry that maintains affection and openness even toward difficult or critical people?
In what relationships is God calling you to speak with an 'open mouth'—frank, transparent communication free from manipulation or hidden agendas?
Open full verse page →
☆ Ye are not straitened in us, but ye are straitened in your own bowels.
Parallel theme: Job 36:16 , Micah 2:7
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:12
Analysis
Ye are not straitened in us (οὐ στενοχωρεῖσθε ἐν ἡμῖν, ou stenochōreisthe en hēmin )—Stenochōreō means to be constricted, cramped, or restricted (from stenos , 'narrow,' and chōra , 'space'). Paul insists the problem isn't on his side—he hasn't withdrawn affection or narrowed his heart toward the Corinthians. His love provides ample space for them. The present tense indicates an ongoing state: you are not (and continue not to be) restricted by us.
But ye are straitened in your own bowels (στενοχωρεῖσθε δὲ ἐν τοῖς σπλάγχνοις ὑμῶν, stenochōreisthe de en tois splanchnois hymōn )—Splanchna literally means intestines or inner organs, metaphorically the seat of emotions and affections (translated 'bowels' in KJV, better rendered 'hearts' or 'affections' in modern English). The constriction exists in their hearts, not Paul's. They have narrowed their affections toward him, withdrawing emotionally due to criticism, misunderstanding, or wounded pride.
Paul diagnoses the relational problem with surgical precision: the Corinthians experience emotional constriction, but they've misidentified the source. They blame Paul for distance they themselves have created. This is the psychology of projection—attributing one's own attitudes to another. Paul's appeal invites them to recognize and remedy their own hardness of heart.
Historical Context
The Corinthians had been influenced by Paul's opponents to view him suspiciously. They questioned his motives, criticized his ministry style, and compared him unfavorably to more polished speakers. This created emotional distance. Paul addresses the root issue: they've constricted their own hearts while imagining Paul has withdrawn his affection first.
Questions for Reflection
In what relationships might you be experiencing constriction that you've wrongly blamed on the other person rather than examining your own heart?
How does Paul's gentle diagnosis of the Corinthians' 'straitened bowels' model addressing relational problems with both honesty and grace?
What causes your heart to become constricted toward others—criticism, wounded pride, suspicion, unforgiveness—and how can you cultivate enlargement instead?
Open full verse page →
☆ Now for a recompence in the same, (I speak as unto my children,) be ye also enlarged.
Parallel theme: 3 John 1:4
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:13
Analysis
Now for a recompence in the same (τὴν δὲ αὐτὴν ἀντιμισθίαν, tēn de autēn antimisthian )—Antimisthia means recompense, repayment, or exchange in kind. Paul uses commercial metaphor: as fair return for my enlarged heart toward you, I ask for reciprocal enlargement from you. Autēn ('same' or 'likewise') emphasizes the matching nature of what Paul requests—the same open-hearted affection he's shown them.
I speak as unto my children (ὡς τέκνοις λέγω, hōs teknois legō )—Teknon (child) indicates both the natural authority of Paul's apostolic fatherhood and the tender affection of parental love. Paul founded the Corinthian church (1 Cor 4:15: 'In Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel'), giving him paternal standing. But the term also conveys warmth—he addresses them not as rebellious subjects but as beloved children who need correction and encouragement.
Be ye also enlarged (πλατύνθητε καὶ ὑμεῖς, platynthēte kai hymeis )—The aorist imperative platynthēte commands decisive action: 'enlarge your hearts!' Kai hymeis ('also you') creates reciprocity: I have enlarged my heart toward you; now you enlarge yours toward me. This isn't mere sentimentalism but a call to repentance—to put away suspicion, criticism, and coolness, replacing them with renewed trust and affection.
Paul's appeal combines authority and tenderness, directness and warmth. He commands as an apostle but entreats as a father. The enlargement he seeks isn't merely emotional warmth but restored relationship based on truth and mutual trust.
Historical Context
Paul's parental imagery recalls his earlier statement in 1 Corinthians 4:14-15 where he claimed unique apostolic authority as their father in the gospel. False teachers had tried to usurp this relationship, presenting themselves as superior 'guides' (1 Cor 4:15). Paul reasserts his fatherly role while appealing for reconciliation rather than wielding authority heavy-handedly.
Questions for Reflection
How does viewing spiritual leaders as 'fathers in the gospel' who have earned the right to speak into your life affect your response to correction?
What specific steps can you take to 'be enlarged' toward someone—putting away suspicion and criticism, renewing trust and affection?
How does Paul model the balance between apostolic authority and fatherly tenderness in addressing those who have grown cold toward you?
Open full verse page →
Do Not Be Unequally Yoked
☆ Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?
Righteousness: Proverbs 29:27 . Parallel theme: Leviticus 19:19 , 1 Kings 18:21 , Psalms 106:35 , Proverbs 22:24 +5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:14
Analysis
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers (Μὴ γίνεσθε ἑτεροζυγοῦντες ἀπίστοις, Mē ginesthe heterozygountes apistois )—Heterozygountes (present participle of heterozygeō ) appears only here in the New Testament. It literally means 'being yoked with a different kind' or 'mismatched yoking,' alluding to Deuteronomy 22:10: 'Thou shalt not plow with an ox and an ass together.' Apistos (unbeliever) doesn't necessarily mean atheist but anyone who hasn't trusted Christ for salvation. The present imperative with mē means 'stop becoming' or 'do not continue to be' unequally yoked.
For what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? (τίς γὰρ μετοχὴ δικαιοσύνῃ καὶ ἀνομίᾳ; tis gar metochē dikaiosynē kai anomia? )—Paul begins five rapid-fire rhetorical questions proving the incompatibility of believers with unbelievers. Metochē means partnership, sharing, or participation. Dikaiosynē (righteousness) versus anomia (lawlessness, unrighteousness) represents fundamental moral incompatibility. The expected answer: 'None!'
And what communion hath light with darkness? (τίς δὲ κοινωνία φωτὶ πρὸς σκότος; tis de koinōnia phōti pros skotos? )—Koinōnia (fellowship, communion, partnership) asks about shared life and intimate association. Phōs (light) versus skotos (darkness) expresses absolute spiritual antithesis (cf. John 1:5; 8:12; Eph 5:8; 1 John 1:5-7). Light and darkness cannot coexist or cooperate.
This abrupt section (vv.14-7:1) addresses the Corinthians' compromising entanglements with paganism. While Paul isn't commanding social isolation (1 Cor 5:9-10), he prohibits binding partnerships that compromise Christian distinctiveness. The 'unequal yoke' applies to marriage, business partnerships, religious syncretism, and any covenant relationship requiring shared convictions.
Historical Context
Corinth was a notoriously immoral pagan city with temples to multiple deities, including Aphrodite's temple with its cult prostitution. The Corinthian church struggled with maintaining separation from pagan practices (1 Cor 8-10 addresses meat offered to idols; 1 Cor 5-6 addresses sexual immorality). Paul calls them to maintain spiritual distinctiveness without becoming isolationist.
Questions for Reflection
In what relationships or partnerships might you be 'unequally yoked' in ways that compromise your Christian convictions or testimony?
How do you balance Paul's call to be separate with Jesus's command to be 'in the world' as salt and light?
What specific entanglements with 'unrighteousness' or 'darkness' is the Holy Spirit convicting you to sever?
Open full verse page →
☆ And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
Parallel theme: 1 Kings 18:21
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:15
Analysis
And what concord hath Christ with Belial? (τίς δὲ συμφώνησις Χριστῷ πρὸς Βελίαρ; tis de symphōnēsis Christō pros Beliar? )—Symphōnēsis means harmony, agreement, or concord (root of 'symphony'). Beliar (Hebrew בְּלִיַּעַל, beliya'al , 'worthlessness' or 'wickedness') appears in the Old Testament for wicked or lawless people (Deut 13:13; Judg 19:22; 1 Sam 2:12). By New Testament times it became a name for Satan or demonic powers. Paul personifies ultimate spiritual antithesis: Christ versus Satan. The answer: zero concord, absolute incompatibility.
Or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? (ἢ τίς μερὶς πιστῷ μετὰ ἀπίστου; ē tis meris pistō meta apistou? )—Meris means share, portion, or part—what they have in common or can share together. Pistos (believer, faithful one) versus apistos (unbeliever, unfaithful one) represents the fundamental divide of humanity: those who trust Christ and those who don't. In ultimate spiritual realities, they have no common ground, no shared inheritance, no mutual spiritual life.
Paul escalates from abstract concepts (righteousness/unrighteousness, light/darkness) to personal embodiments (Christ/Satan, believer/unbeliever). This isn't merely philosophical incompatibility but personal, relational impossibility. Attempting to unite opposites doesn't create synthesis but compromise—the holy is polluted, not the profane sanctified, when wrongly mixed.
Historical Context
Belial appears in Jewish apocalyptic literature (Dead Sea Scrolls, Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs) as a leader of demonic forces opposing God. Paul uses this familiar Jewish concept to express absolute spiritual antithesis. The Corinthians' tolerance of pagan entanglements amounted to attempting harmony between Christ and Satan—spiritual adultery against their covenant Lord.
Questions for Reflection
How does recognizing that unequal yoking attempts 'concord between Christ and Belial' help you see the spiritual stakes of compromising partnerships?
In what areas of life might you be trying to maintain 'fellowship' between your faith and practices fundamentally opposed to Christ?
How does the believer/unbeliever distinction affect your closest relationships, especially regarding marriage, business, or ministry partnerships?
Open full verse page →
☆ And what agreement hath the temple of GodGod: Θεός (Theos ). The Greek Theos (Θεός) refers to deity, used both for the one true God and false gods. Context determines whether it denotes the Father specifically or the Godhead generally. References God: Exodus 29:45 , Leviticus 26:12 , Jeremiah 24:7 , 31:33 , 32:38 +5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:16
Analysis
And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? (τίς δὲ συγκατάθεσις ναῷ θεοῦ μετὰ εἰδώλων; tis de synkatathesis naō theou meta eidōlōn? )—Synkatathesis means agreement, union, or compact. Naos (temple) refers to the inner sanctuary, the holy of holies where God dwells. Eidōlon (idol) refers to false gods and their images. Paul's fifth rhetorical question reaches the climax: God's temple cannot coexist with idols—this would be the abomination of desolation itself.
For ye are the temple of the living God (ἡμεῖς γὰρ ναὸς θεοῦ ἐσμεν ζῶντος, hēmeis gar naos theou esmen zōntos )—Paul answers his own question by identifying believers corporately as God's temple. Theos zōn (living God) contrasts with dead idols (Ps 115:4-7). This echoes 1 Corinthians 3:16-17 and anticipates Ephesians 2:19-22. Christians individually and corporately are indwelt by God's Spirit, making them sacred space. To compromise with idolatry is to defile God's holy dwelling.
As God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them (καθὼς εἶπεν ὁ θεὸς ὅτι Ἐνοικήσω ἐν αὐτοῖς καὶ ἐμπεριπατήσω, kathōs eipen ho theos hoti Enoikēsō en autois kai emperipatēsō )—Paul combines Leviticus 26:11-12, Ezekiel 37:27, and perhaps other texts in a composite quotation. Enoikeō (dwell in) and emperipateō (walk among) express God's covenant presence—the fulfillment of tabernacle/temple theology. What was promised to Israel now applies to the church.
And I will be their God, and they shall be my people (καὶ ἔσομαι αὐτῶν θεός, καὶ αὐτοὶ ἔσονταί μου λαός, kai esomai autōn theos, kai autoi esontai mou laos )—This is the covenant formula repeated throughout Scripture (Gen 17:7-8; Ex 6:7; Jer 31:33; Ezek 36:28; Rev 21:3). Believers enjoy covenant relationship with the living God, who dwells in them by His Spirit. This sacred identity demands separation from idolatry.
Historical Context
The Corinthian church existed in a city filled with pagan temples and idol worship. Temples to Apollo, Aphrodite, and other deities dominated the cityscape. Christians were tempted to compromise by participating in temple feasts and pagan rituals for social or business reasons (1 Cor 8-10). Paul reminds them that they themselves are God's temple, making such compromise unthinkable.
Questions for Reflection
How does understanding yourself as 'the temple of the living God' affect your view of personal holiness and what you allow into your life?
What modern 'idols' might you be allowing 'agreement' with in ways that defile God's temple?
How should the reality that God dwells in and walks among His people motivate both personal purity and corporate holiness in the church?
Open full verse page →
☆ Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the LordLord: Κύριος (Kurios ). The Greek Kurios (Κύριος) means 'lord' or 'master,' used both for human masters and divinely for God the Father and Jesus Christ. Its application to Jesus affirms His deity, as it translates YHWH in the Septuagint. References Lord: Ezra 6:21 , 10:11 , Isaiah 52:11 , Jeremiah 51:6 . Parallel theme: 2 Corinthians 7:1 +5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:17
Analysis
Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord (διὸ ἐξέλθατε ἐκ μέσου αὐτῶν καὶ ἀφορίσθητε, λέγει κύριος, dio exelthate ek mesou autōn kai aphoristhēte, legei kyrios )—Dio ('wherefore, therefore') grounds this command in the preceding identity: because you are God's temple. Exelthate (aorist imperative of exerchomai ) commands decisive departure—'come out!' Aphoristhēte (aorist passive imperative of aphorizō , 'separate, set apart') recalls Israel's call to be a holy nation (Lev 20:24-26). This isn't social isolation but spiritual distinctiveness—refusing partnerships and practices that compromise covenant loyalty.
And touch not the unclean thing (καὶ ἀκαθάρτου μὴ ἅπτεσθε, kai akathartou mē haptesthe )—Akathartos (unclean) evokes Levitical purity laws (Lev 5:2; 11:8; Isa 52:11). Haptomai (touch, handle, cling to) suggests intimate contact. Paul applies ceremonial uncleanness metaphorically to moral and spiritual defilement—primarily idolatry and its associated immorality. The present imperative with mē means 'stop touching' or 'do not continue touching.'
And I will receive you (κἀγὼ εἰσδέξομαι ὑμᾶς, kagō eisdexomai hymas )—Eisdechomai means to receive favorably, welcome, accept. The future tense promises God's responsive reception when His people obey the call to separation. This echoes God's acceptance of Israel after they separated from Egypt (Ex 19:5-6) and anticipates eschatological acceptance into God's presence. Separation from the world is the pathway to intimacy with God—we cannot embrace both simultaneously.
Historical Context
Paul quotes loosely from Isaiah 52:11 (LXX), originally commanding exiles to leave Babylon ceremonially clean as they carried temple vessels back to Jerusalem. Paul applies this exodus/exile typology to Christians: we are to 'come out' from spiritual Babylon (worldliness, idolatry, compromise) and maintain covenant purity as we journey to the heavenly city (cf. Rev 18:4).
Questions for Reflection
From what specific entanglements is God calling you to 'come out' and 'be separate' in order to maintain covenant purity?
How do you discern the difference between biblical separation (maintaining spiritual distinctiveness) and sinful separatism (Pharisaic isolationism)?
What promise of divine reception motivates your willingness to accept the cost and loneliness that sometimes accompanies separation from worldliness?
Open full verse page →
☆ And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.
References Lord: Genesis 17:1 , Revelation 1:8 . Parallel theme: 2 Samuel 7:14 , Isaiah 43:6 , Jeremiah 31:9 +5
Study Note · 2 Corinthians 6:18
Analysis
And will be a Father unto you (καὶ ἔσομαι ὑμῖν εἰς πατέρα, kai esomai hymin eis patera )—Patēr (father) represents the most intimate covenant relationship. God promises not merely to be sovereign Lord or distant Creator but tender Father. This fulfills messianic promises (2 Sam 7:14; Isa 43:6) and anticipates Jesus's teaching on the fatherhood of God (Matt 6:9; John 20:17). The future tense indicates the ongoing reality of this relationship for those who obey the call to separation.
And ye shall be my sons and daughters (καὶ ὑμεῖς ἔσεσθέ μοι εἰς υἱοὺς καὶ θυγατέρας, kai hymeis esesthe moi eis huious kai thygateras )—Huios (sons) and thygatēr (daughters) emphasizes the full inclusion of both genders in God's family—unusual in ancient patriarchal cultures that often emphasized sons exclusively. This equality recalls Galatians 3:28: in Christ there is neither male nor female. All believers enjoy full adoption rights and inheritance as God's children (Rom 8:14-17; Gal 4:4-7).
Saith the Lord Almighty (λέγει κύριος παντοκράτωρ, legei kyrios pantokratōr )—Pantokratōr means 'all-powerful, almighty, ruler of all' (used frequently in Revelation: 1:8; 4:8; 11:17; 15:3; 16:7, 14; 19:6, 15; 21:22). This title, translating Hebrew יְהוָה צְבָאוֹת (Yahweh Tseva'ot , 'LORD of hosts'), emphasizes God's sovereign power to fulfill His promises and protect His children. The One commanding separation has both the authority to demand it and the power to sustain those who obey.
This climactic verse transforms the call to separation from negative prohibition into positive promise: separation from the world results in adoption into God's family. We leave lesser loves and false securities to gain the infinite privilege of being God's beloved children, with all the intimacy, provision, protection, and inheritance that entails.
Historical Context
Ancient Greco-Roman society was organized around patron-client relationships and household loyalties. Paul reframes Christian identity using family language: believers are adopted into God's household as sons and daughters of the Almighty. This provided both comfort (the omnipotent God is our Father) and challenge (family loyalty requires separation from competing allegiances).
Questions for Reflection
How does the promise of being God's son or daughter motivate your willingness to separate from worldly entanglements?
In what practical ways can you live as a child of 'the Lord Almighty'—trusting His power, honoring His name, enjoying His presence?
How should your identity as God's adopted child affect your daily priorities, relationships, and decisions?
Open full verse page →